Looking at the website and deck the first impression that i have is someone giving iphone to 5 year old kid explaining how cool the device is and asking to make sense of it, or rather scene from "Don`t Look Up scene"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vu4vHuz_qP0&t=113s
I am only giving this project 2 starts given the amount of time that was invested into making of deck, website and all the integrations.
Naming as a Gate Game didn`t make any sense to me, i did think the same about TikTok first time it was introduced to international audience after their success in China under chinese name, but they had enormous traction in China and TikTok was powered by already successful parent company - ByteDance.
Deck is informative and yet failed to communicate its core vision, what problem is being solved, why we need to solve this problem, how is it going to make impact in the both, gaming and blockchain, i know 3 other direct competitors of this project and none of them were included, furthermore, no competitive analysis, no measurable roadmap, no team, advisory.
Either team was lazy enough to research online how to develop pitch deck from their target audience stand point or slightly sself-indulged in their completed milestone i.e. functioning website with current traction that we can`t track or validate.
Website is quite ecosystemic which i like, if i think of any giant in the industry, they all started from one single service that scaled, later introduced additional features, suite of products/services making it easier for end users to keep benefitting from their infrastructure, in thie case, it`s exactly the opposite.
I hope remarks will help team re-evaluate their epic mistakes and start taking seemingly simple item like deck and later website more serious, run A/B testing and apply required changes. Show Less
