I'm between 3 and 4 stars. 2 things are important to me when I do an initial project review: A) is the project legit, and B) is there any innovation.
I think they're legit for the following reasons:
- Founder has 18K followers on Linkedin and Agile Dynamics has 10K. Both have a strong public footprint with several publications. That's a great plus, setting them apart from most crypto projects (I would highlight this a lot more on the website).
- The whitepaper and docs look detailed and well structured. It would take me too much time to dig through them, but it looks good at the surface.
- Agile Dynamics' business and clients makes me believe they can get their target customers for their chain.
However, to receive 4 stars, a project needs to communicate their edge in only a couple minutes.
Con:
- I've seen a lot of very similar projects going for a semi-permissionless chain to cater to the corporate world and I don't see their edge at first sight.
- The marketing is still very raw. The website is ok looking, but the copy is way to detailed. I would highlight the founder's personal achievements as well as Agile Dynamics' client list at the top of the page and present your main innovation in 1 section (header, 3-4 sentences, image). Don't expect people to read your entire whitepaper or to spend more than 5 min on your website.
If you can convince your audience that you're legit and have a great innovation within 5 min, you're winning! Show Less
1
