I just read a review on LOVE, where the pattern of "burn" plays a central part. Joining a review site can be giving insights, but also feel ruthless, but I think centralization and burn are repeating itself again, also in this project.

The documents look like they have been written on paper, on a rainy day in a weekend somewhere when power was off and the candle didn't help in giving some inspiration. Result: A doubtful, questionable project, which with similar approach, many good projects are existing. Entering like this will just throw you on the pile of: whatever and it feels like copy paste work, like so many projects do.

Most info is only about staking.. but there's no solid revenue model showing for that.. Just what stakers can get. How do I know the right ratio of supply and liquidity will appear.

Below from DOC unstaking

E.g.: Repeating story: When you choose to end a stake, it will result in the NFT representation being burned, and the $WATT and/or LP tokens will be removed from the staking pool. Show Less

2024 Cyrator - Verified Crypto Intel

Disclaimer: The content presented on this website, including any analyses, reviews, and ratings, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Cyrator does not endorse or recommend any financial transactions or investments based on the information available on this platform. Visitors to this site should perform their own due diligence and consult with a professional financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Cyrator is not liable for any actions taken, financial or otherwise, based on information or links from this website.