After conducting a quick scan, I noticed that Thinkin lacks a convincing concept and fails to clearly outline the problem they aim to solve.
Some major concerns are as follows:
-
The tokenomics appear peculiar. Allocating 15% for the team and advisors may seem to benefit investors. With a 12-month cliff and then receiving 0.5% monthly, it would take around 200 months to reach 100%. The seed and presale participants however have a 6-month cliff and receive 1.625% each quarter, leading to nearly the same duration of around 200 months to complete vesting, which is too long for investors.
-
The team remains largely anonymous (undoxxed) and lacks convincing profiles on LinkedIn.
-
There is a high probability of purchased Twitter followers, as most posts receive only around 300 views, with exceptions occasionally reaching 1,000 or more, yet they claim to have 28.5k followers. Show Less