Thinkin

$THINK

After conducting a quick scan, I noticed that Thinkin lacks a convincing concept and fails to clearly outline the problem they aim to solve.

Some major concerns are as follows:

  1. The tokenomics appear peculiar. Allocating 15% for the team and advisors may seem to benefit investors. With a 12-month cliff and then receiving 0.5% monthly, it would take around 200 months to reach 100%. The seed and presale participants however have a 6-month cliff and receive 1.625% each quarter, leading to nearly the same duration of around 200 months to complete vesting, which is too long for investors.

  2. The team remains largely anonymous (undoxxed) and lacks convincing profiles on LinkedIn.

  3. There is a high probability of purchased Twitter followers, as most posts receive only around 300 views, with exceptions occasionally reaching 1,000 or more, yet they claim to have 28.5k followers. Show Less

 2
2024 Cyrator - Crypto Research Community

Disclaimer: The content presented on this website, including any analyses, reviews, and ratings, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Cyrator does not endorse or recommend any financial transactions or investments based on the information available on this platform. Visitors to this site should perform their own due diligence and consult with a professional financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Cyrator is not liable for any actions taken, financial or otherwise, based on information or links from this website.