When I was first going through the project criteria checklist, Unilayer appeared to meet most of my requirements of what I would be looking for on a credible project with potential which is why I initially gave it 5*. Their website stands out with its excellent design and functionality, effectively conveying the project's purpose. I appreciated their approach of providing a concise and easily understandable litepaper for broader audiences, while also offering a detailed and comprehensive whitepaper for the technical aspects that a project of this caliber should have.
However my mistake was I skimmed through the tokenomics briefly and even then I saw the team + advisors had over a quarter of the supply which was a slight concern, but then another Cyrator member brought to my attention that actually a whopping 80% of Unilayer tokeneconomics is owned by the team & investors. I will never invest or trust in a project with this kind of centralisation of their tokenomics.
It's a shame as Unilayer appeared promising in so many other categories outside of its tokenomics. I know very much doubt it will be able to challenge successfully in the interoperability sector. Show Less
1
