I was just about to conduct a MR review of the ALI project when I stumbled upon the tokenomics. Allow me to play the devil's advocate for a moment, but aren't the tokenomics among the worst you've encountered?
Let's break it down:
-
Firstly, there's a significant amount of private sale pressure that remains constant, which could (highly) potentially hinder the token's price growth.
-
Secondly, there seems to be a relatively rapid release of tokens allocated for the team and advisors. This also raises doubts about the project's long-term vision.
-
A substantial number of tokens are earmarked for marketing every month. While success may help offset potential losses from advisor/team token sales, it raises questions about whether (a good chunk) these funds will also be used for listing purposes. It could lead to significant troubles from that too as CEXs are able to sell these too, which in my experience almost always happen.
-
Approximately 16 months in, and already half of the circulating supply is in circulation. This rapid release may have unforeseen consequences.
I've noticed that there are primarily 4 and 5-star reviews, and it has me genuinely wondering: am I missing something here? Is my perspective on this matter incorrect? I would greatly appreciate your insights on this. Show Less
5
