In the investor's deck, the first thing that caught my attention is a solution that doesn't seem one (as shown in Image 1). The writing appears rushed and lacks thorough consideration, which is a recurring issue throughout the presentation.

They create art, according to the website. Slides are mainly about games, and their approach looks like they made a game and attach NFTs to it. Confusing. Going from Qubix to this review really shows what they did well, and what Spacegoat lacks.

In the section about games, they reference some outdated benchmark examples like the Thief game and attempt to blend in development and NFT options, which is nothing new or exciting in my eyes.

Another concerning aspect I came across is their investment allocation, with a significant 50% dedicated to the team. Unless the presale/seed sale comprises less than 3% of the total allocation to the team, I believe they may not fully grasp the importance of using the funds wisely.

In summary, I fail to see how they can perform with the existing solution, and I also struggle to identify any concrete solutions they propose. Show Less

 4
2024 Cyrator - Crypto Research Community

Disclaimer: The content presented on this website, including any analyses, reviews, and ratings, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Cyrator does not endorse or recommend any financial transactions or investments based on the information available on this platform. Visitors to this site should perform their own due diligence and consult with a professional financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Cyrator is not liable for any actions taken, financial or otherwise, based on information or links from this website.