Max supply is 10B tokens
2.2B tokens were sold in private round (sequoia capital, etc.) fully vested by month 28 (a little over 2 years) raised $3.9M: 22% of total supply => $0.00177 per tokens. (by the time the IDO occurs those investors will have converted $3.9M  into $15.4M in 2 years.
500M tokens will be sold in public round opening in 2 days @ $0.007 on a 6 months vesting: 5% of total supply (aim to raise $3.5M)
Launchpad presale 10M tokens @ $0.006: 0.1% of total supply (aim to raise $60K)
IDO partners, seems like they are listed on decentralized exchange, so this is to fund the liquidity pool 90M tokens: 0.9% of total supply. They need to allocate $630,000 to their liquidity pool... very small pool compared to the $15.4M of value the private investors own at this point, fortunately they won't vest fully on day 1, but I expect them to see as soon as they can. With such a small pool, any buying volume will increase the price significantly, and make the early investors generate even more value on paper, the slaughter will being after as the price keep declining rapidly, unless they have massive adoption with traders, I doubt that's the case since they target the idiot gamblers. Big money will probably stick to binance and other trusted exchanges.

By the time the IDO launch, the team will own $14M of value combined with the private investors that's $29.4M for a liquidity pool of $630K. If we factor in all token supply at this point even though it's not fully vested, it value the token at $70M with a $630K liquidity pool. I just don't like unsustainable growth that are engineered as pump and dumps. Why wouldn't sell equity to Sequoia and the other investors, it's an exchange that will generate income on trading volume, that is the upside for the early investors, why give them so much tokens so cheaply?

tokens received for free:
team and advisors 20% of supply: 2B tokens
treasury and ecosystem: 43% of supply: 4.3B tokens
liquidity and incentives: 6% of supply: 600M tokens
so 69% of the supply is controlled by the team. Even publicly listed companies do not have that ratio of control. The community would own nearly nothing of this token, while it would be controlled mainly by the team, and by a few private investors like Sequoia which are likely to dump hard.

They have a moonsheet.... it's a chart that just show how much return you make if the prices does up to a certain amount... completely arbitrarily... They made a mistake on the price, they say IDO price is at $0.006 while the public round is at $0.007. A chart like this is really not serious. At $0.007 that already give them a fully diluted market cap of $70M, so if the prices goes up to $180 that's a $1.8T fully diluted market cap. I don't know why they claim binance is a $45B market cap and that would be comparable to them if the prices goes to $180, either they need to learn to count or I do... 10B tokens at $180, that's not $45B market cap unless you consider just a portion of your total supply at a specific time before your token fully vest. It's very misleading and completely stupid imo.

Overall, I can't say I'm interested in this one. Probably will have high ROI initially... just to crash and burn after. I didn't get to see if they allocated a % of the income back to the token economy like GMX does.

Finblox aims to be a crypto superapp with gamified features built within a secure and compliant platform

Finblox

Max supply is 10B tokens
- 2.2B tokens were sold in private round (sequoia capital, etc.) fully vested by month 28 (a little over 2 years) raised $3.9M: 22% of total supply => $0.00177 per tokens. (by the time the IDO occurs those investors will have converted $3.9M  into $15.4M in 2 years.
- 500M tokens will be sold in public round opening in 2 days @ $0.007 on a 6 months vesting: 5% of total supply (aim to raise $3.5M)
- Launchpad presale 10M tokens @ $0.006: 0.1% of total supply (aim to raise $60K)
- IDO partners, seems like they are listed on decentralized exchange, so this is to fund the liquidity pool 90M tokens: 0.9% of total supply. They need to allocate $630,000 to their liquidity pool... very small pool compared to the $15.4M of value the private investors own at this point, fortunately they won't vest fully on day 1, but I expect them to see as soon as they can. With such a small pool, any buying volume will increase the price significantly, and make the early investors generate even more value on paper, the slaughter will being after as the price keep declining rapidly, unless they have massive adoption with traders, I doubt that's the case since they target the idiot gamblers. Big money will probably stick to binance and other trusted exchanges.

By the time the IDO launch, the team will own $14M of value combined with the private investors that's $29.4M for a liquidity pool of $630K. If we factor in all token supply at this point even though it's not fully vested, it value the token at $70M with a $630K liquidity pool. I just don't like unsustainable growth that are engineered as pump and dumps. Why wouldn't sell equity to Sequoia and the other investors, it's an exchange that will generate income on trading volume, that is the upside for the early investors, why give them so much tokens so cheaply?

tokens received for free:
- team and advisors 20% of supply: 2B tokens
- treasury and ecosystem: 43% of supply: 4.3B tokens
- liquidity and incentives: 6% of supply: 600M tokens
so 69% of the supply is controlled by the team. Even publicly listed companies do not have that ratio of control. The community would own nearly nothing of this token, while it would be controlled mainly by the team, and by a few private investors like Sequoia which are likely to dump hard.

They have a moonsheet.... it's a chart that just show how much return you make if the prices does up to a certain amount... completely arbitrarily... They made a mistake on the price, they say IDO price is at $0.006 while the public round is at $0.007. A chart like this is really not serious. At $0.007 that already give them a fully diluted market cap of $70M, so if the prices goes up to $180 that's a $1.8T fully diluted market cap. I don't know why they claim binance is a $45B market cap and that would be comparable to them if the prices goes to $180, either they need to learn to count or I do... 10B tokens at $180, that's not $45B market cap unless you consider just a portion of your total supply at a specific time before your token fully vest. It's very misleading and completely stupid imo.

Overall, I can't say I'm interested in this one. Probably will have high ROI initially... just to crash and burn after. I didn't get to see if they allocated a % of the income back to the token economy like GMX does.

Crypto Rookies

Finblox consists of two core team members as well as a team of around 60 additional team members.

The Co-Founder and CEO is Peter Hoang. Peter previously Co-founded Gotrade, a zero-commission stock trading app backed by Y Combinator. He is also currently the co-Founder and CEO of Stealth Startup. He has a strong background in investing and tech.

Dmitriy Paunin (co-Founder and CTO) was the Chief Technology Officer at Coins.ph - Southeast Asia's largest cryptocurrency exchange based in the Philippines that amassed over 16 million users.  He was also the VP for Tech for the Alibaba Group in Singapore. He is currently the founder and CEO of Destiny, whose product Destiny X is a prediction markets platform that allows you to make bets on real-life events such as sports and political elections. Destiny X is a related product to Finblox.

Finblox are invested in by Saison Capital, one of the largest credit companies in Japan along with CoinFund, Dragonfly and Sequoia. They also had 3AC backing previously, but we unfortunately know what happened to them.

According to a recent AMA hosted by Decubate, Peter stated there are 60 other team members including devs, product designers and marketing. I can find no direct evidence of this, so I will need to take his word for it.

Refs: https://www.linkedin.com/in/peterhoangski/;  https://www.linkedin.com/in/paunin/;
AMA with Peter: https://twitter.com/decubate/status/1655240635136262145?s=20

Finblox consists of two core team members as well as a team of around 60 additional team members. 

The Co-Founder and CEO is Peter Hoang. Peter previously Co-founded Gotrade, a zero-commission stock trading app backed by Y Combinator. He is also currently the co-Founder and CEO of Stealth Startup. He has a strong background in investing and tech. 

Dmitriy Paunin (co-Founder and CTO) was the Chief Technology Officer at Coins.ph - Southeast Asia's largest cryptocurrency exchange based in the Philippines that amassed over 16 million users.  He was also the VP for Tech for the Alibaba Group in Singapore. He is currently the founder and CEO of Destiny, whose product Destiny X is a prediction markets platform that allows you to make bets on real-life events such as sports and political elections. Destiny X is a related product to Finblox. 

Finblox are invested in by Saison Capital, one of the largest credit companies in Japan along with CoinFund, Dragonfly and Sequoia. They also had 3AC backing previously, but we unfortunately know what happened to them. 

According to a recent AMA hosted by Decubate, Peter stated there are 60 other team members including devs, product designers and marketing. I can find no direct evidence of this, so I will need to take his word for it.

Refs: https://www.linkedin.com/in/peterhoangski/;  https://www.linkedin.com/in/paunin/;
AMA with Peter: https://twitter.com/decubate/status/1655240635136262145?s=20

Blueseriph

Big ideas require big bucks, lots of planning and well designed execution, when i look at finblox i seem to have mixed feelings.

Story:

Great story with catchy promises built for masses that seem to be too sweet to be true, and yet historic facts, statistics show anything remotely close to offering, or rather  promising 100X in return has always been the road to rabbit hole, but what is the catch? List of VCs and validated cofounders with a well-proven previous background. (Refer to idea and micro review)

I would spare more time to work and polish the narrative, even though the idea needs to be validated based on predictions, the promise looks interesting.

VCs and Founding team members:

No description of comments are required by looking at some of the big names among backers  and experience that founding team members have, an admirable combination.

Community and marketing:

Twitter looks consistent, lots of updates, periodic AMA sessions that increases credibility level towards the project, discord didn`t look impressive, but i appreciated simplicity in the server, absence of telegram where every single degen uses it raises questions…

PR:

Several articles and press releases were rolled out after getting funding from VCs which is a good and very important move. The presence of listed VCs makes it easy for the team to open any doors in the industry.

I have not tried to use the product yet, this is a subject for the next review and check on their progress…

Big ideas require big bucks, lots of planning and well designed execution, when i look at finblox i seem to have mixed feelings.

Story:

Great story with catchy promises built for masses that seem to be too sweet to be true, and yet historic facts, statistics show anything remotely close to offering, or rather  promising 100X in return has always been the road to rabbit hole, but what is the catch? List of VCs and validated cofounders with a well-proven previous background. (Refer to idea and micro review)

I would spare more time to work and polish the narrative, even though the idea needs to be validated based on predictions, the promise looks interesting. 

VCs and Founding team members:

No description of comments are required by looking at some of the big names among backers  and experience that founding team members have, an admirable combination. 

Community and marketing:

Twitter looks consistent, lots of updates, periodic AMA sessions that increases credibility level towards the project, discord didn`t look impressive, but i appreciated simplicity in the server, absence of telegram where every single degen uses it raises questions… 

PR:

Several articles and press releases were rolled out after getting funding from VCs which is a good and very important move. The presence of listed VCs makes it easy for the team to open any doors in the industry. 

I have not tried to use the product yet, this is a subject for the next review and check on their progress…

Sun Tzu

Overall, while there are some potential advantages such as recent listing and the potential for future growth, the token also faces challenges such as low market cap, price volatility, and limited trading volume. I should carefully advice to evaluate the token's fundamentals and market conditions before considering any investment.

Price info
Based on the available information, the token's market cap is relatively small at $3.34 million. It has experienced fluctuations in price, reaching an all-time high of $0.0122 before declining to $0.00435, resulting in a significant drop of 61.1%. The IEO ROI is negative at -21.1%, indicating a decrease in value since the initial offering.
Fully Diluted Market Cap	$38,153,236 -26.61%

Pre-launch info
The IDO sale raised a moderate amount, contributing to a market cap of $1,440,000. The fully diluted market cap is higher at $57,375,163, suggesting potential future growth. The circulating supply is 240,000,000 tokens after the IDO sale.

Recent FBX Burn
19th of May 2023, $3.07m was burned, a total of 437M FBX tokens.

Trading Volume, Pair and Exchanges
The token's current trading availability on MEXC and Gatio.io (80.29% vol) exchanges with a 24h volume of $143,116. The only pair available to date is FBX/USDT.
BTSE announced on the 18th of May 2023 that they will list FBX.

User Engagement
The platform’s gamified features encourage high user engagement, potentially driving the demand for FBX.

Governance Rights
Once implemented, FBX token holders will be able to have a say in the platform’s future direction.

Much more information I could not find

Overall, while there are some potential advantages such as recent listing and the potential for future growth, the token also faces challenges such as low market cap, price volatility, and limited trading volume. I should carefully advice to evaluate the token's fundamentals and market conditions before considering any investment.

Price info
Based on the available information, the token's market cap is relatively small at $3.34 million. It has experienced fluctuations in price, reaching an all-time high of $0.0122 before declining to $0.00435, resulting in a significant drop of 61.1%. The IEO ROI is negative at -21.1%, indicating a decrease in value since the initial offering.
Fully Diluted Market Cap	$38,153,236 -26.61%

Pre-launch info
The IDO sale raised a moderate amount, contributing to a market cap of $1,440,000. The fully diluted market cap is higher at $57,375,163, suggesting potential future growth. The circulating supply is 240,000,000 tokens after the IDO sale.

Recent FBX Burn
19th of May 2023, $3.07m was burned, a total of 437M FBX tokens.

Trading Volume, Pair and Exchanges
The token's current trading availability on MEXC and Gatio.io (80.29% vol) exchanges with a 24h volume of $143,116. The only pair available to date is FBX/USDT. 
BTSE announced on the 18th of May 2023 that they will list FBX.

User Engagement
The platform’s gamified features encourage high user engagement, potentially driving the demand for FBX.

Governance Rights
Once implemented, FBX token holders will be able to have a say in the platform’s future direction.

Much more information I could not find

Finblox

More Reviews of Finblox